A recent Forbes article gave some interesting insights into Putin’s leadership style. The author, Moshe Cohen, a senior lecturer in management and organizations at the University of St Petersburg, explained that while the Russian leader doesn’t always make it clear what his strategy is, he does use subtle and oblique communication to influence his followers. In doing so, he has successfully emulated Putin’s approach to leadership. Let’s take a closer look at his style.
According to the contingency theory, there are two types of leadership styles: task motivated and relationship motivated. As the former is based on leverage, Putin is using authority to achieve his goals. While this might sound like a good way to lead, it’s probably not the best approach for the current situation. Instead, it will make matters worse. And given the ongoing crisis in Ukraine, it may be better for Putin to consider a different approach.
In the last few months, President Putin has demonstrated his ability to use a task-oriented leadership style. In the Ukraine crisis, his behavior is consistent with this style. The contingency theory states that low LPC scores are effective in favorable situations and unfavorable situations. Fortunately, the situation with Ukraine is highly volatile and is the perfect candidate for a low LPC score. Regardless of his leadership style, the outcome of this conflict has been a disaster for the Ukraine.
While many people believe that Putin has a task-oriented leadership style, he is not always effective. The reason for this is that his LPC scores are low compared to his other personality traits. This means that he’s ineffective when the situation is in his control, and he’s unlikely to be able to achieve his goal. As a result, he is likely to exhibit symptoms of anxiety and stress, which will make his decision-making process less efficient.
While it is possible to have different leadership styles in different situations, it is important to understand which one is most appropriate for the situation. A leader’s position power is the authority he has over his followers. In the case of a president, his role establishes legitimacy. While a military commander’s position power is not, however, legitimately imposed by a president. In this case, the situational variable is the leader’s ability to punish and reward followers.
Despite the risks of conflict, Putin’s leadership style is highly effective. His government is popular, competent, and merciless, and his staff has never broken ranks or attacked perceived enemies. In other words, his leadership style matches the situation. It’s the best choice for the situation. It is highly effective. In this sense, it is highly recommended that leaders use their position power when they want to win an election. But, there are also other factors that need to be considered when choosing a leader.
While a strong leader can be a good leader, a weak leader will not work as well in a different situation. It’s critical to find out what kind of power the leader has and what it does to maintain it. As president of Russia, Vladimir Putin has strong position power and is the legitimate ruler of the country. As a result, he can effectively control his military, police, and the country. In the end, position power helps the Russian leadership style.
While his country is facing a tough situation, it has many advantages. The Russian President believes that Ukraine is a part of Russia. Moreover, he sees NATO’s expansion in the east as hostile. As a result, he is able to orchestrate events in a way that benefits his country. If he is a strong leader, his nation is more likely to be successful. The United States should be a strong ally.
In this case, the Russian President is a dictator. He believes that Ukraine is part of Russia. He also views the expansion of NATO in the east as a hostile act. The United States is concerned about the stability of Europe and its involvement in a foreign war. In these cases, a strong leader is more likely to make decisions that are in the best interest of his country and its citizens. Similarly, a weak leader will be more likely to be ineffective if he is not able to adapt his leadership style to the situation at hand.
